The processing of “law” by the computer requires a two-way mechanism. It needs a tool capable of simultaneously translating calculation into logic and vice versa. Particularly relevant are the studies and thoughts of brilliant minds that, here, with apologies, can only be mentioned: Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz and George Boole, […]
English
Techno-science, as a function of the predictability of the judgment, is a compulsory path for the achievement of a longed-for and never fully achieved Enlightenment “certainty” of law, which is identified in the famous phrase, according to which the judge should be the “mouth of the law”[1]. Renato Borruso remembers […]
In our time, the words of Emanuele Severino[2] echo: “…at the opposite of the authors who profess a probable rapprochement between the technical and the divine, I would say that there is rather a substitution, or rather a new face acquired by the divine. This face now presents itself as […]
Once upon a time, according to Umberto Galimberti, technology was placed at the service of man and could be said to be good or bad depending on the use made of it. Today, technology no longer has a modest dimension and is difficult to “subjugate”. Technology has expanded incredibly, becoming […]
Once upon a time, according to Umberto Galimberti, technology was placed at the service of man and could be said to be good or bad depending on the use made of it. Today, technology no longer has a modest dimension and is difficult to “subjugate”. Technology has expanded incredibly, becoming […]
The idea of using, also in the legal field, formulas that can be algorithmized and codified in a language that can be interpreted by a “machine” is an ancient thought that today finds new vigor and momentum. In fact, the need to adapt traditional regulatory production to current regulatory and […]